Are The Urantia Book's teachings impacting on Christian Theology?


(continued from Innerface Vol. 12, No. 3)

   In our previous issue we provided the first part of the condensation of a book entitled "Jesus, a New Vision," by Professor Marcus J. Borg--a book that expresses extraordinarily similar concepts of Jesus post-baptismal life as are presented in The Urantia Book. And nowhere could we find any major conceptual disparities between the two views of Jesus' teachings or view points during those terminal years--all of which lead to the question, "Was Borg directly or indirectly influenced by the Urantia revelation?

   We noted previously that Borg referenced more than 100 supporting works--virtually all from professional scholars, thus indicating that he is by no means alone in holding the view he does.

   In this presentation, we complete the condensed component of Borg's book, while providing references to similar views expressed in The Urantia Book.

Jesus: A New Vision
(condensed from the book by Marcus J. Borg)


The Jesus movement as an alternative culture.


   The spiritualization which we see in the Jesus movement also appears in the Old Testament--for example in Psalm 5:17, "The sacrifice acceptable to God is a broken and a contrite heart." The conflict between the Jesus movement and its contemporaries was not really a conflict between two different religions, one ancient and the other an alternative version which was freshly in touch with the Spirit. The politics of compassion addressed the two central issues generated by the crisis in the Jewish social world: the growing internal division within Jewish society, and the deepening of the conflict with Rome.

   Jesus' emphasis upon compassion as the ethos and politics of the people of God contravened the barriers created by Israel's social world, made up of its blend of conventional wisdom, holiness, exclusivity, and patriarchy.

   Historically speaking, Jesus sought to transform his social world by creating an alternative community structured around compassion, with norms that moved in the direction of inclusiveness, acceptance, love, and peace. The alternative consciousness he taught as a sage generated a "contrast society," an "alternative consciousness" grounded in Spirit.

   Thus Jesus saw the life of the Spirit as "incarnational," informing and transforming the life of culture. His mission, however, did not simply involve the creation of an alternative community. It also involved him in radical criticism of his culture's present path, warning his people of the catastrophic historical direction in which they were headed. (TUB 176:1)

   From TUB:
"When you finally see  Jerusalem being encompassed by the Roman armies after the revolt of the false prophets, then you will know that her desolation is at hand; then you must flee to the mountains." (176:1.4)

Jesus as prophet: Jesus identified with his prophetic predecessors such as Ezekiel and Jeremiah. Like these prophets, his twofold focus was God and the cultural life of his people in a time of crisis. Like them, the pattern of threat, indictment, and call to change ran throughout his ministry. Indeed his passion for the historical life of his people ultimately cost him his own life.

Crisis: the threat to the social world:
The mission of Jesus was dominated by a sense of urgency and crisis. He charged his contemporaries with knowing how to interpret the signs of the weather, but not knowing how to interpret the present time. Images and parables of crisis and judgment abound in the Gospels--servants being suddenly called to account; maidens asleep and without oil for their lamps; people finding themselves shut out of a banquet because they didn't respond. He warned his generation that they, in particular, faced a crisis: "The blood of the prophets, shed from the foundation of the world, will come upon this generation!"

   But what was the crisis? According to the biblical scholarship that dominated the 20th century, Jesus thought the end of the world was nigh. But though Jesus did speak of a last judgment, there is no reason to believe he thought it was immanent. Rather, like the prophets before him, the crisis he announced was the threat of historical catastrophe for his society. (TUB 176:1)

Home Page
Previous Page
Next Page